pinkteddyx64 wrote:princechromey wrote:pinkteddyx64 wrote:princechromey wrote:pinkteddyx64 wrote:princechromey wrote:pinkteddyx64 wrote:princechromey wrote:Yay, I got a 100 post though I've felt absolutely terrible today with a bad case of either a cold, or the flu...
Can I throw eggs at James_W because of you not feeling well?
Yes, you sure can, after all, "I think James_W is a load of shit and I sued him and wish him and threw a brick at his house!"
Wonder if you can eventually overtake me in these statistics?
I wonder how many times out of that 70 on the leaderboard that you broke the 10th post rule to get the 100?
From now on I will be checking
Will you be voiding any rule breaking 100s?
From now on, if I spot them, potentially yes - or I'll award them to the people who should have actually got them (once excessive posts have been taken into consideration).
We've had enough rule breaking on TSR, we don't want it here either
Why are you only just deciding to clamp down on this now?
Because it would be way too much work (and too much disruption) for me to trawl through about 15,000 posts, deleting excessive posts and then having to edit every single number that was then affected. I don't have the time nor patience to do that (and that would make me very sad indeed).
But, just like on TSR, we need to make sure 100 posts are won fairly and that there is no cheating going on! Cheating on CTAM (or any other counting series) is not allowed.